Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Re: [PDI] [CitizensTruth] Are we chumps? / Ending The Hidden Agenda Behind "Tax Cuts"

I think the below article speaks to the same principles Hal is bringing
up, but from a more "conventional" - if you will - angle.





Truthout Original


Ending the Hidden Agenda Behind Tax Cuts

Tuesday 17 February 2009

by: Joe Brewer, t r u t h o u t | Perspective


The way that taxation is viewed by the public has a lot to do with the
way politicians frame the debate. (Artwork:

*/Something as simple as a metaphor can mean the difference between
shared prosperity and widespread suffering./*

It's time to tell the truth about tax cuts. This phrase dominates
political discourse and is coughed out every time a conservative public
figure opens his mouth. It is treated like the basis of sound reasoning,
yet no one points out what should be obvious - that "tax relief" and
"tax cuts" are just code words for destroying the capacity of government
to serve the public.

We've heard over and over again that the source of society's
problems is the government. The solution that follows is to "trim the
fat," "cut out the waste," "shrink the government" and provide "relief"
to millions of citizens who suffer the burden of exploitation by
Washington elites. This story flies in the face of the facts, yet it
makes sense to a significant portion of the US population. How can this be?

The answer has to do with how we make sense of things in the world.
Our experiences shape what seems legitimate by reinforcing (or
undermining) our ideas about the way things work. So, for example, a
progressive politician may speak honestly and forcefully about the
positive role of government in our lives. But this will fall on deaf
ears if our typical experience is at odds with such claims. This
observation demonstrates a key element of what George Lakoff and I have
<> the
*Cognitive Criterion for Public Support:*

/An effective policy must be popular if it is to stand the test of
time and it must be popular for the right reasons, namely because it
promotes the right long-term values in the minds of citizens, reinforced
through the lived experience./

The reason many people accept conservative claims about taxation and
government is that they hold up for many common experiences, especially
when conservatives are in control of the government. Conservative
officials enact policies that make life worse for people while claiming
that things will get better. Then they draw upon these negative
experiences to advance their agenda. No Child Left Behind is an
excellent example. The strategy works like this (a more detailed
analysis can be found here

1. Declare that the agenda is to "improve" public education.

2. Pass legislation that cripples public schools.

3. Cry out for "reform" when people see how bad our schools are doing.

4. Get rid of public schools and replace them with private schools,
especially schools that teach conservative ideology (e.g. elite
charter schools, religious schools, etc.).

This strategy demonstrates how *cognitive policy
works. Emphasis is given to how people understand what is happening. The
goal is to ensure that our experiences are interpreted through a
conservative lens. It is not literally the case that taxation is a
burden (a provocative metaphor), but rather that our common sense is
influenced by a combination of our experiences in the world and the
interpretive filters that give them meaning. (A key feature of how the
political mind works, as I discuss in The Great Political Blind Spot

Back to the hidden agenda behind tax cuts; we can apply this insight
to see that conservatives *want* people to have negative experiences
with government. Why? Because it supports decades of propaganda - and an
underlying belief that stems from their worldview - that government is
the problem. In the early 1970's, conservative elites started investing
heavily in the creation of idea factories to spread their views far and
wide so that they eventually became the new common sense of our culture.
They had to work tirelessly for years to change the underlying values of
American citizens because our long history has been devoted to advancing
our most cherished values, which happen to be progressive. But, as we
can see by the pervasiveness of their ideas today, this effort has been
catastrophically successful.

Now is the time to nip their bankrupt idea about taxation in the
bud. The way to do it is simple. Take their reasoning to its logical
conclusion and see what happens if it is applied to the real world. We
can test the conservative belief about taxation against our own and
decide what's best by looking at the outcomes.

First, we'll need to be very clear about just what conservatives and
progressives mean by taxation. Then we can apply these understandings to
the world to see their consequences. (The insights that follow come from
linguistic analysis of cognitive "frames
that shape political thought.)

*Taxation as Conservatives Understand It*

I've already alluded to an interesting metaphor that helps make
sense of conservative thought about taxes, which I'll call Taxes Are a
Burden to make it explicit. The understanding of taxation that follows
from this metaphor can be seen in this story:

/Hard-working Americans are in need of some tax relief. Years of
mismanagement by tax-and-spend liberals have taken money out of the
hands of working people and put it into bloated government programs that
serve special interests. We need to cut taxes, return fiscal
responsibility to government, and put money back in the hands of
taxpayers who know best how to spend it./

This perspective is grounded in two beliefs: (1) The world is
comprised of individuals; and (2) People are inherently bad and must
learn right from wrong through self-discipline. I like to call this the
"Me First" perspective because it assumes that people must help
themselves before thinking about others. It can be summarized with the
declaration, "You're on your own!" The Me First perspective assumes that
any assistance from the community would be "coddling" or "spoiling" us.
This claim is asserted as truth in the conservative worldview.

*Taxation as Progressives Understand It*

Progressives have a different understanding of taxation that can be
expressed through a variety of metaphors: Taxes Are an Investment, Taxes
Are Membership Dues, Taxes Are Pathways to Opportunity, Taxes Are
Infrastructure and Taxes Are a Duty. (Read more about progressive
taxation in "Progressive Taxation: Some Hidden Truths
Reasoning that emerges with these metaphors can be seen in this
progressive story:

/Our great nation was founded on a promise of protection and
opportunity. Through our shared wealth, pooled together by taxation with
representation, we have invested in the public infrastructure that makes
possible the creation of new wealth. We have a sacred trust to keep this
promise alive throughout our lifetimes, expand it as we are able, and
pass it along to our children./

This perspective is grounded in the beliefs that (1) Individuals are
influenced significantly by our communities; and (2) People are
inherently good and benefit from cooperation with others. I like to call
this the "People First" perspective because it assumes that people must
help each other in order to enhance their ability to help themselves. It
can be summarized with the declaration, "We're all in this together!"
The People First perspective assumes that we are greater than the sum of
our parts and that new opportunities emerge when we make wise
investments with the common wealth we share.

*Truth and Consequences*

Now that we have a clear sense of what taxation means to
conservatives and progressives, we can see what happens if these
different ideas are used as governing principles for shaping society.
This analysis accomplishes two purposes. First, it reveals key truths
about taxation that complicate arguments made by conservatives, truths
that don't get talked about nearly enough. And second, it exposes a
covert agenda that deceptively exploits real concerns of people to
advance an otherwise unpopular agenda.

What happens if the Me First perspective is applied to taxation?
Just look to the world we find ourselves in today. A problem defined as
"too much spending" leads to budget cuts. This results in a diminished
capacity to provide vital services. Public goods like education, civil
and criminal courts, road maintenance and fundamental scientific
research are too costly for individuals - or even multinational
corporations - to afford. So these services are cut and people lose
their jobs. Thousands of teachers no longer cultivating young minds.
Countless construction workers laid off when city and state governments
halt infrastructure projects. Graduates with advanced degrees unable to
find work because public agencies are "tightening their belts" and
cutting back on grants to academia, nonprofits and the private sector.

Beyond the direct human suffering of disrupted lives, there is
substantial reduction in government programs that protect the public
against harm. The FDA cannot staff enough inspectors to keep toxic
peanuts out of the food supply. The EPA lacks capacity to keep drinking
water clean in cities and towns across the country. The SEC is unable to
keep a watchful eye on runaway speculation and our economy spins wildly
out of control. Bridges crumble and levies break because funds are in
short supply.

The consequence of conservative ideology is a self-fulfilling
prophecy. People are forced to be "on their own" with no protection
against serious threats and no assistance to get them beyond their
current means. When disasters strike, there is widespread suffering and
death because the tapestry of society - our precious safety net - has
withered and decayed. Think I'm exaggerating? I'll just say one word -

And despite their claims to the contrary, conservative leaders
*want* this to happen <>.

Contrast this with the People First perspective. Again, we can let
experience be our guide. A decade of rampant deregulation, perpetrated
by a conservative mindset about the relationship between government and
the economy, led to the great stock market crash of 1929. A visionary
progressive leader, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, stepped in and vastly
expanded a wide variety of public programs. The flood of revenues
accompanying this expansion was enough to put millions of unemployed
back to work. New programs that embody the spirit of progress emerged in
the decades that followed. Social Security, the GI Bill, Medicare and
the FDIC are a few examples of the legacy this pooling of resources
delivered to the American people.

Along with this massive investment in societal infrastructure,
Americans experienced tremendous growth of shared prosperity. For the
first time in our history, an entire generation of children from
working-class families moved up the economic ladder with college degrees
in hand. Home ownership skyrocketed. Literacy rates went through the
roof and new skills emerged to expand the capacity of markets. And two
generations of people experienced the benefits of cooperation in their
daily lives, codifying the ethic that we're all in it together as a
bedrock of sound reason.

I can attest to this from personal experience. Both of my parents
came from working-class families. I was the first to get a college
degree. Federal and state scholarships delivered me from the rural farm
to the hallowed halls. And now society gets to benefit from the fruits
of my labor as I work to transform our political system for the
betterment of society. The cognitive policy of the People First
perspective is a foundation of my identity in the world.

*The Hidden Agenda Exposed*

The progress of our nation is being held hostage by a malicious
metaphor. Treating taxation as nothing more than a burden is tantamount
to declaring that citizenship is nothing more than getting all you can
for yourself ... everyone else be damned. Conservative elites have
undermined the responsibilities we have to one another to advance their
agenda. They are fully committed to crafting the world in their image,
as we've seen all too clearly these last eight years and throughout the
current debate about economic recovery under the Obama administration.

I say enough is enough. Let's call this tactic out for what it is.
People are hurting in every corner of the land and they're looking for
help where they haven't dared to look for quite some time - in the
service of our representatives in the federal government. Conservatives
will try to convince us that our hardships are caused by excessive
government. The truth is that we are suffering under excessive
/conservative ideology of governance,/ which is a very different beast.
They continue to claim that we can't get ahead because we're overtaxed.
This claim is absurd!

Not a single home foreclosure throughout this crisis has been caused
by excessive taxation. The misfortune of illness in a dysfunctional
health system has burdened people with horrendous debt. /Where did this
problem come from? Profit-driven health care created under the Nixon

Banks haven't failed catastrophically through oversized personal W-2
forms. Radical deregulation is the culprit. /Who deregulated the market?
Conservative ideologues from both political parties./ (This is what the
word "centrist" really means - conservatives who've infiltrated the
Democratic Party.)

Companies haven't been driven to huge layoffs because their tax
burden is too high. They are victims of an unraveling market. /What
undermined the integrity of the global economy? An extremist philosophy
of governance that is blind to the role of the regulatory frameworks
that give stabilizing structure to our markets./

What can we do to stop the conservative agenda? Call it out for what
it is. When someone says, "People need tax relief," respond by letting
them know that "We /really/ need to invest in one another." Make it
clear what the consequences of tax cuts really are - the destruction of
our mechanisms for protecting and empowering one another. And let's stop
taking their language for granted just because everyone is doing it.
That logic didn't make much sense in middle school. It's all the more
dangerous to follow as adults. Challenge the conservative meaning of
taxation directly. Declare that we are decidedly NOT on our own. Point
to the benefits we've taken for granted too long, things like education
and schools and roads and courts.

We mustn't stop with a critique of their ideas either. We need to
fervently argue for our own. Together we are greater than the sum of our
parts. A prosperous community is a place where neighbors pool their
efforts for the greater good. Taxes provide resources for investments
larger than anything we could build on our own. And these benefits
create a space for new ideas to take hold and expand our wealth.

Ideas matter. Words are important. We cannot afford to let a radical
minority set the tone of public debate any longer. The time is ripe for
moving beyond the era of misguided individualism. Let's take the
momentum we've built in the last few years and place the United States
back on a course that resonates with our deeply held values - caring for
one another, expanding freedoms to the marginalized, and recognizing
that our shared prosperity is at the core of our success as a nation.


/Joe Brewer is founder and director of Cognitive Policy Works
<>, an educational and research
center devoted to the application of cognitive and behavioral sciences
to politics. He is a former fellow of the Rockridge Institute
<>, a think tank founded by George
Lakoff to analyze political discourse for the progressive movement. This
article has been previously published on the Cognitive Policy Works site

Hal Snyder wrote:
> The Baseline Scenario report has Simon Johnson's view of the
> underlying economics.
> Regarding the notion of an entrenched cadre of individuals, amassing
> and holding onto unimaginable wealth and power *at any cost to the
> rest of the planet*, recall work by Peter Phillips and Project
> Censored on the Global Dominance Group.
> I think Bill Moyers and Simon (IMF) Johnson are still bumping
> around *inside the box*. For example the chuckling over how we clearly
> don't want the government running the banks, imagine going to the bank
> being like a visit to the DMV, ha ha ha. Actually,* going to private
> banks* these days is very much like a visit to the DMV where I live.
> Also: when the government intervenes on a failing (small) bank, the
> bank is promptly re-privatized [/what a relief/].... And so on.
> 1. There are at least as many *threats to individual liberty in these
> times from the private sector* as there are from the government. Or
> have we taken our eyes off: Monsanto, Choicepoint, Blackwater,
> Pharma, big media, the health insurance industry, predatory lenders,
> etc...
> 2. I don't think the current mess will be resolved until we realize
> *it's not about money*. The recent discussion on this list about where
> we put our personal energy, our time, our hearts - that's the *real
> currency of the human race*. It's time to shake off decades of
> free-market brainwashing and acknowledge higher human principles than
> greed. And not just acknowledge these principles, but elevate them as
> our greatest aspirations.
> Putting a dollar amount on every object or act or creature, and
> somehow expecting whims of human commerce (the free market) to produce
> a just or sustainable result makes about as much sense to me as making
> big decisions based on which way the wind blows.
> 3. Derrick Jensen says that if someone can slide insane premises past
> you, they can use flawless logic to take you to an insane conclusion.
> For example:
> */How can we get the economy growing again?/*
> This assumes a) we want the economy to grow, b) we want an economy,
> and c) there is some agreement of who "we" are.
> Jensen gives reasons we might say no to a) and b) and suggests that
> "we", the implied beneficiaries of a growing economy, leaves out much
> of the human race as well as most other life on the planet.
> How do they face their children?
> On Feb 17, 2009, at 7:24 PM, Mike Kirk wrote:
>> I saw part of this - very honest and to the point.
>> Americans need to realize we are not immune from financial turmoil.
>> -Mike
>> --- On *Tue, 2/17/09, Chuck Minne /<
>> <>>/* wrote:
>> From: Chuck Minne < <>>
>> Subject: [CitizensTruth] Are we chumps?
>> To:
>> <>
>> Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 6:26 PM
>> This is worth watching:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> CitizensTruth mailing list
> website:
PDI mailing list

This message was sent to
To unsubscribe, visit the URL above, or email for assistance.

No comments: